| Type | Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle | Source | Last Checked |  |
 |
Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.
Article Source: Pajamas MediaPCC expert reviewer Gray — whose 1,898 comments critical of the 2007 report were ignored — recently found that proof of the fraud was public for years.
Sometimes with a puzzle you are missing the parts that allow you to make sense of the whole and allow you to put the pieces together. This is what the purloined emails from CRU are, the missing parts.
 | Climategate: the IPCC is over says UEA climate scientist | Telegraph | Fri Nov 27 | 3 |
| The hacked climate science email scandal that wasn't | ScienceBlogs | Fri Nov 27 | 96 |
| Works and Days » Riding the Back of the Tiger: Obama undermining what little deterrence the US has | Pajamas Media | Fri Nov 27 | 0 |
| Climategate – perpetrators, perpetuators, by-standers and victims | Examiner | Fri Nov 27 | 0 |
| Climate Gate Hacked Emails | www.charlotteconservative.com | Fri Nov 27 | 3 |
Wigley fails to say, however, that his colleagues Jones and Karl are guilty of much worse than Wang — as they continued to use their fraudulent paper to boost their constant and sometimes daily assertion that recent global temperatures are unprecedented.
Thus the trickle increases to a flood.
#1 - Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:33 PM ESTSpace Guy, you are good. Very interesting read. Hope you had a great Turkey day. Later.
#2 - Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:39 PM ESTPax
Here is another.
Thanks. Very good read and very valuable to recognize what is happening right now. You're a pretty smart guy yourself being able to find these articles. Once again thank you.
I wonder if now that global warming has become a religion with an economy built around it, it will ever be debunked? People believe in it, therefore it is.
#3 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:35 AM ESTDeleted as spam.
#5 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:59 PM ESTSo you post 5 articles rehashing the same argument, and I post the same on-topic counter-argument to each post, and I get deleted for spamming? Just because you don't agree with my point of view?
Stay classy, Space Cadet.
#6 - Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:26 PM ESTSo you post 5 articles rehashing the same argument, and I post the same on-topic counter-argument to each post, and I get deleted for spamming? Just because you don't agree with my point of view?
Each time I post a new seed or article, I add information or different sources. I ask you to at least take the effort to state something new and not simply spam the exact same wording in each thread.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
Log In | Register
Start Tracking
Stop Tracking