Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.
Article Source: Pajamas MediaThis is truly troubling. Without replication there is no science. No we cannot take your word for what you claim, especially when the lives of billions of your fellow humans will be effected.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts" is how the great Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman defined science.
No, by definition of the integrity of science, we cannot "just" trust you.
Trust, but verify.
If this attitude is allowed to stand, the very bedrock of science is broken.
#1 - Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:59 PM EDTIt stands to reason that someone who is not confident in his work and
has something to hide would be less inclined to publish his data and
methodology for all the internet to see . I have yet to read any statistical
measures of significance for the CO2 variable in these complex analyses .
#4 - Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:59 PM EDTSome one sent this to me, and I was going to seed it, but then saw it had already been seeded. Why no comments from the usual suspects, who claim we're wrong based on the "consensus" of "experts?"
#5 - Mon Aug 2, 2010 11:08 AM EDTYou're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
Log In | Register
